THE CIS NEWS

August 2005 

This issue of The CIS News is coming to you from the CIS E-mail address -- cissupport@nisc.com. Comments, questions, concerns, etc., should be directed to that address.

[Format problems?  If the format of this newsletter goes doesn't suit your E-mail reader, try taking a look at the HTML version of the newsletter in The CIS News archive.  You can reach it through http://www.nisc.com/cis/.]

UPDATES
Several existing CIS databases were updated  in August.
SANSS:

Some 5,000 chemical names not previously reflected in SANSS were added during the course of the August update.  The database now includes references to more than 678,000 chemical substances.  Furthermore, the number of other sources of information cited in SANSS records has increased to more than 80.  Among the more noteworthy additions to these references are the following:

--The Merck Index (13th edition, 2001) and The Merck Index (10th edition, 1983).  With these additions, SANSS now makes reference to five different editions of The Merck Index (editions 9 through 13, 1976 through 2001 -- the most recent edition of the work).  The references to the 10th edition (1983) are not yet complete, however; they will be completed in some future update.

--The Aldrich catalog/handbook for 2003-2004 (partial listings, the balance to be completed in some future update).  With this addition, SANSS now references four different editions of the Aldrich catalog/handbook (1996-1997, 1998-1999, 2000-2001, and 2003-2004).

--The National Toxicology Program's 11th Report on Carcinogens (2005).  These listings include substance-by-substance classifications -- e.g., "Known human carcinogen" -- and a click-through link to the online report.  (The 8th, 9th, and 10th Reports are also referenced in SANSS.  They also include the classifications, but do not have online links.)

--IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans (from the International Agency for Research on Cancer). These references include IARC's substance-by- substance classifications -- e.g., "Group 2A, Probably carcinogenic to humans" -- as of July, 2004.

--Two publications from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) -- AHFS Drug Information (2005) and Handbook on Injectable Drugs (2004).

RTECS®:

A regular quarterly update to the RTECS (R) database increased the number of records in the database to more than 161,000, each dealing with one chemical substance.

RCRIS (RCRAInfo:

This database of RCRA-licensed sites/facilities increased to some 658,000 records, each one dealing with a single site or facility.

TRI (Toxics Release Inventory):
The 2003 data (the latest set available) were added to this database.  The database now includes more than 1,400,000 records.  Note that this database permits searching either by chemical (CAS RN is preferred) or by site data (e.g., ZIP code, company/facility name) or a combination of the two.  You can also limit retrievals to a given year (1987 through 2003) or set of years; there are a number of ways of doing this, but the simplest is probably by using the Publication Year fields.

ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System -- formerly DOCKET):

This database contains records of administrative and judicial actions for alleged violations of environmental laws and regulations. There are now 58,192 records of administrative proceedings in the database and 6,082 records of formal judicial proceedings.
New Jersey Hazardous Substance Fact Sheets:
This excellent database of MSDS-like documents now covers some 1,700 individual substances.  (Note that this is one of several databases in CIS that includes MSDSs or MSDS-like records.  The MALLIN database includes MSDSs from Mallinckrodt-Baker, and CHRIS and HSDB both also contain the kinds of information that turns up in MSDSs.  In addition, the SANSS database makes reference to many sites on the Internet where MSDSs can be located.)
OTHER DATABASES:

The CCRIS, HSDB, ISHOW, MALLIN, and TSCAINV databases also were expanded modestly in the course of the recent update.

XP AND POPUPS

A chemical information listserv to which we subscribe recently was deluged with complaints about automatic popup blockers.  The general consensus was that these should be turned off. This is because so many database services use popups to convey certain types of responses to search inputs.  CIS is among the generators of popups:  We use them to communicate suggestions for broader searches when a given search has produced no results.  These suggestions appear in a popup because the alternative -- opening a new window -- was absolutely unacceptable to so many users. Unfortunately, however, if you have an automatic popup blocker in operation, the suggestions we're trying to make get smothered, and the system appears to be working oddly or even to have frozen.

This is a problem with several types of browsers -- e.g., Netscape, Firefox -- but it's a special problem with the version of Internet Explorer that comes bundled with the Windows XP operating system. The version of IE that's bundled with XP differs from other forms of IE in that there's a popup blocker in it, and it's set to "on" by default.

If you're using Windows XP and CIS, please go to Tools - Options - Popup Blocker when you're in the browser.  Add the following to the list of domains from which popups are ALLOWED:

Biblioline.NISC.com

This is the domain from which CIS operates, and adding that domain to the list of allowable sources will eliminate the problems caused by the default popup arrangement.

If you've noticed other database services acting oddly when using IE under XP in recent weeks, you might try checking this setting for those database services as well.  When we began telling users who called us about this difficulty, several realized that they had already encountered the same problem elsewhere without being able to figure out what was going on.

SURVEY OF PRINT MATERIALS

As noted in earlier issues of this newsletter, we are bulking up the number of references to print materials in the SANSS database.  We are adding references to Internet-accessible references as well, but print appeals to us for the some of the same reasons that print appeals to lots of technical librarians -- one-time-only cost; continuing availability regardless of eternally mutating Internet addresses; the opportunity for a student to see not just that record he/she requested, but that record in the context of thousands of other adjacent records whose similarities/differences might be illuminating; etc.

In the course of thinking about additions to the set of print references in SANSS, we had occasion to check on print holdings of certain chemical references in libraries at 17 colleges and universities in Pennsylvania.  The schools all offer degrees in environmental science and/or chemistry.  Some are relatively small bachelor's- degree institutions; a few are major PhD-level universities.  We were looking at 21 editions of five reference works:

--The Merck Index (9th-13th editions, 1976-2001)

--the Aldrich catalog (editions of 1996-1997, 1998- 1999, 2000-2001, 2003-2004, and 2005-2006)

--Condensed Chemical Dictionary (10th-14th editions, 1981-2001)

--Dictionary of Organic Compounds (5th and 6th editions, 1982 and 1996)

--Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Compounds (1st-4th editions, 1977-2001)

Of the 21 editions involved, the SANSS database currently references 11, and we were considering what other references should be added to that database in future updates.

For what it's worth, here are some results of the survey:

--None of the works is universally held. Furthermore, those schools which had one or another work frequently did not have the most recent edition.  Given the five works at 17 schools, there are 85 opportunities (17 x 5) for schools to have the most recent edition; however, the most recent edition was held in only 23 of 85 cases.  The next-to-last edition was held in 29 of 85 cases.  None of the schools had the most recent edition of ALL of the five works; furthermore, if you ignore the Aldrich catalog (see below), none of the schools had the most recent edition of ALL of the other four works.  The holdings at several schools reflected an obvious pattern of acquiring only every other edition of a work that's reissued frequently.

--Various editions of The Merck Index appear to be the most widely held of these reference works: 94.1% of the schools had some form of The Merck Index, and 12 of the 17 had the most recent edition.  The listings for several schools indicated that they had the electronic version of the most recent edition.

--The Condensed Chemical Dictionary was the second most widely held work:  82.4% of the schools held some form of the CCD, and five of the 17 had the most recent edition.

--The Aldrich catalog is not so widely held as we might have guessed -- only five of 17 schools indicating a library listing.  However, we suspect that this might reflect a library cataloging issue:  Several schools that did have one version or another of the Aldrich catalog included notations that copies held on reserve were "personal" copies.  We suspect that many professors have this excellent, free catalog on their own shelves; that the "personal" copies on reserve were put there by professors; and that librarians have not bothered to add the Aldrich catalog to their collections because (1) it's ubiquitous among the interested faculty and (2) they're not aware of how much useful information this work communicates.

For the record, here are the holdings we found among the 17 schools:

Aldrich handbook/catalog, 1996-1997 - 0 of 17

Aldrich handbook/catalog, 1998-1999 - 0 of 17

Aldrich handbook/catalog, 2000-2001 - 3 of 17

Aldrich handbook/catalog, 2003-2004 - 2 of 17

Aldrich handbook/catalog, 2005-2006 - 1 of 17

Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 10th edition (1981) - 7 of 17

Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th edition (1987) - 5 of 17

Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th edition (1993) - 3 of 17

Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th edition (1997) - 5 of 17

Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th edition (2001) - 5 of 17

Dictionary of Organic Compounds, 5th edition (1982) - 8 of 17

Dictionary of Organic Compounds, 6th edition (1996) - 3 of 17

Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Compounds, 1st edition (1977) - 5 of 17

Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Compounds, 2nd edition (1983) - 3 of 17

Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Compounds, 3rd edition (1996) - 3 of 17

Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Compounds, 4th edition (2001) - 2 of 17

The Merck Index, 9th edition (1976) - 7 of 17

The Merck Index, 10th edition (1983) - 7 of 17

The Merck Index, 11th edition (1989) - 8 of 17

The Merck Index, 12th edition (1996) - 11 of 17

The Merck Index, 13th edition (2001) - 12 of 17

- 30 -

View April 2005 Newsletter
View December 2004 Newsletter
View August 2004 Newsletter
View April 2004 Newsletter
View Febrary 2004 Newsletter
View August 2003 Newsletter
View March 2003 Newsletter
View October 2002 Newsletter
View March 2002 Newsletter
View October 2001 Newsletter


National Information Services Corporation
NISC USA

 
Wyman Towers, 3100 St. Paul Street,

Baltimore, Maryland 21218 USA
Tel: +1 410 2430797 Fax: +1 410 2430982
cissupport@nisc.com
www.nisc.com/CIS
A Company in the Public Interest  
Copyright © 2004 National Information Services Corporation. All Rights Reserved.