Research Article
Rotational grazing approaches reduces external and internal parasite loads in cattle
DOI:
10.2989/10220119.2019.1628104
Author(s):
Monde RapiyaDepartment of Livestock and Pasture Science, South Africa, Heidi-Jayne HawkinsDepartment Biological Sciences, South Africa, Voster MuchenjeDepartment of Livestock and Pasture Science, South Africa, John F MupangwaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Namibia, Munyaradzi C MarufuDepartment of Production Animal Studies, South Africa, Kennedy DzamaDepartment of Animal Sciences, South Africa, Cletos MapiyeDepartment of Animal Sciences, South Africa,
Abstract
We tested whether holistic planned grazing (HPG) and four-camp grazing (FCG) rotational grazing approaches influence beef cattle parasites counts compared with continuous, season-long (SLG) grazing. We expected that parasite counts would increase linearly with increasing camp occupancy by cattle from 1 d (70-camp, HPG) to 21–28 d (four-camp, FCG) to 180 d (one-camp per season, SLG). Tick and faecal egg counts were observed across seasons on 30 steers raised on a private farm in Cedarville, South Africa. Tick species identified were Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Hyalomma spp. and Amblyomma hebreaum with respective prevalences of 32%, 29%, 20% and 19%. Unidentified roundworms had the highest faecal worm egg counts (81.2%) followed by Coccidia (16.4%), Nematodirus (1.2%) and strongyles (1.2%). Overall, prevalence and mean counts for ticks and faecal worm eggs were highest in the hot wet season, with the SLG having greater (P ≤ 0.05) values than either of the rotational approaches. However, increasing camp number and animal densities above four camps did not reduce (P > 0.05) parasite loads compared with HPG. Current results suggest that rotational grazing is a potential strategy to reduce livestock losses caused by high tick and worm loads in cattle, especially in the hot wet season.
Get new issue alerts for African Journal of Range & Forage Science